Since I have began offering legal insurance on this website, I have gotten a huge outpour of responses, both positive and negative. On the positive side, people are excited that they now have affordable access to the legal system 24 hours a day, nationwide. They have the ability to call an attorney when they are pulled over or need to have a legal document constructed, such as a living will all for an inclusive single monthly price.
Having an attorney on deck is a great “plan B” to us sovereign warriors who are often fighting legal battles all alone. Often times, if you are pulled over, simply having access to an attorney will scare the officer away and he will let you go from detainment. As freedom fighters, we often times get ourselves in too many unneeded battles that use up our resources and leave us in poverty. Many of the battles we are fighting can be easily mitigated with our insurance plan.
The negative side to all of this is obvious. Many of you are saying things like, “If I use a BAR licensed attorney and involve him in my case then aren’t I handing over jurisdiction?” , perhaps temporarily in some fashion, but this fear is unwarranted. In many cases, judges will refuse to answer questions without a BAR attorney being present in your case. Whatever the case may be, you can also reverse your associations with a BAR attorney later on by citing “duress”.
Our goals should be to get cases dismissed, (by any means), even if it calls for referencing statutes and civil procedures. It is ok to reference the constitution and statutes, as long as you do not “cite” them. By referencing, you are saying, “I am not agreeing to be under these clauses, “BUT” if I were, this is were you are in violation”. Citing something is stating and agreeing that everyone present is under the jurisdiction of whatever doctrine is stated. The only thing that I will ever “cite” is natural law.
( A Christian walks up to a Hindu and cites Bible verses to him, because the Hindu man was treating him unfairly. The Hindu laughs and said, “That book has no bearing on me.” So the Christian “References” the Hindu vedas and shows the Hindu were his actions is wrong). By the Christian “referencing” the Hindu veda, he is not claiming its authority (citing), he is simply “referencing” that according to his own belief, he is wrong in his action. This is how we can reference statutes to government entities without citing it’s authority . It is like saying, “I don’t stand under your regulation, but even if I did, here is where you are in violation….” ect…
But some of us voluntaryist/natural law advocates are still worries about giving up their purist ways. But I assure you all……..
After a case is dismissed, you can always file a civil suit and cite natural rights and dismiss your associations with an attorney, so long as you are operating under your private name. Your legal public corporate name is NOT you. You are coerced into caring for your corporation, thus this is what legal insurance does, it protects your corporation. So long as you do not claim the corporation as your personal identity, then you can continue to operate and/or sue in the capacity of your private and/or common law identification.
We have to learn how to split our minds and beings if we are to operate within society and navigate without our corporate names getting us into trouble.
A wise man once told me, “I don’t mind dancing with demons in order to learn how to defeat their devilish leader”.
Thus, I do not mind associating and spending time with those who work in the government. Oftentimes, consulting with our enemies is the best way to reach and understanding with them. In reality, I have no problem with government existing. In fact, I want to become friends with the government so that we can reach a mutual understanding and I will be left alone. Basically in a nutshell,
“Hey, do your thing, and I’ll do mine….I won’t hurt you, you don’t hurt me. Let’s mind our own business.”
Sun Tzu once said, “If you know yourself and you know your enemy, you will win 100 out 100 battles.”
But let us get something straight. Not all BAR lawyers or government employees are bad people. In fact, I have even met a few that agree with my ideology, they have just chosen to work within the confines of the system for various reasons. This is good news. Sympathizers , whether it be from the left side or the right side, is always a step in the right direction.
I do not seek the destruction of government, I only seek exemption from it and/or a choice in which services I choose to receive from it and/or have the ability to compete with its services on the free-market. That’s it!
Is that such a controversial statement? Is it violent? Is it a cause for concern? No!
So, in closing, if you choose to get legal insurance from my website, rest assured that you are not swearing over jurisdiction.
You are simply employing the assistance of an attorney under duress from the government SEPARATELY from your private name.
A fellow musician once told me,
“There are no rules to this game, you are either winning or losing.”
In my ripen age, I cannot agree more.
How many sovereign freemen do we see who are sick and in financial ruin? Too many!
We need to adopt the tact and emotionless tactics of our opponents. They are willing to use whatever justification needed to win a case or to squeeze money out of their clients or to the judges who make back room deals.
We need to employ our enemies , consult with them daily, and perhaps even befriend them, so that an EVOLUTION can take place and not a revolution.
Whatever you have to do to get a case dismissed,
reference a statute, code, supreme court case, civil procedure, ect….
So long as you aren’t “citing” anything, who cares….
Get your case dismissed, and then sue for wrongful imprisonment, pain/suffering, time lost, ect….
Last but not least, do not be confused dear friends.
Having legal insurance is a wonderful back-up tool that reduces alot of stress, but the goal is still to be self-educated. I still promote the spreading of natural law ideology and for my supporters to learn how to write their own motions, default clauses, and other legal documents. Legal insurance is a great defense, but we still need to offensively spread the doctrines and agenda of natural law/sovereignty.
It is a one-two combination that will result in a winning recipe.
Education without legal insurance will lead to too much stress.
Legal insurance without sovereign education will make it easier and more affordable to have access to the legal system, but natural law ideologies will not grow, thus the main goal of our operation will become a moot point.
The two go hand in hand.
So I am asking my readers to put away their purist attitudes, and adopt a realistic military strategy in their efforts and learn to balance their own safety/success with the continuation of natural law advocacy.
Every corporation in america has an attorney in their back pocket.
Why shouldn’t your corporate name have it’s own attorney in it’s back pocket?
This is the goal of the “affidavit of truth”. To draw the line in the sand between your corporate name and your private name.
Once we distinguish the two, then the controversy goes away.
If you have any questions about legal insurance, feel free to email me and contact me anytime.